Skip to main content

THE ART BUG FT. BOLLYWOOD ~ Anjashi Sarkar


A ridiculously named film under a top production house of the country made it to its release date with promotions skyrocketing themselves under the garb of 'an outsider' being cast in the project but I have other issues with the creative team that is employed in the movies this production house brings out each year. There was another movie that it released and it was more authentic (received a standing ovation in an international film festival) than the latest release but it wasn't hyped as much as the female character who barely had screentime in the former. If given the right kind of briefing, the production house does bring out gems like an action film which gave the country a new face with talent, the talent who also starred as a protagonist in the most watched show on Netflix India (which is all about Bollywood, if you may want the clue) and then getting the appreciation he deserved.

I see a pattern that has emerged in Bollywood in the past few years, especially after 2019. I was aware of this production house's 'game' at making movies, which is mostly about portraying characters that are larger than life. They did entertain us for a while but then you can’t get only glamour in the name of filmmaking or storytelling for that matter. Imagine casting someone from SoBo and she plays a Bengali character with a horrible Gujarati accent just because she couldn’t care to do any research. Her male co-star was phenomenal with a dialect coach working with him and never once, mind you, all throughout the movie he broke character. He is quite a well-spoken, educated and has his way with dainty English words in interviews. Yet, to slip into a character with quirks that doesn’t speak English or has anything to do with what one calls “class”. This is why admirers of art are so important when one is in the business of filmmaking, theatre or performing arts.

The latest release of the production house has a female lead who plays an author from Agra. I don’t think the creative team has any idea about the writing field or publishing industry or how authors live their lives, act, react or engage in common / human scenarios. For that matter, there is little to no interest of the female lead to portray her character that at least looks interesting. I have never met a fellow author, in all my years of writing books, articles, blogs myself has had such poor emotional range as shown through the story. At this point I am convinced this movie was just made to sabotage the career of the male lead who has created quite a stir with some content-backed films in the last two years or so. He is not the best “outsider” we have but he definitely has a respect for his craft because he takes interest in the process. Opulence doesn’t create talent, and it is apparent in the efforts made by the actors cast in some ‘fun’ movies this production house has come up with in the past few years.

It is not the responsibility of the creators alone, but actors too, when they decide to come aboard for a project that is for visual consumption and people pay for that stuff in order to do something recreational weekend to weekend. It is not only for the pay cheque but the ‘job’ they have undertaken. I have also come to the understanding that once the money comes kicking in, there is absolutely no moral high ground these ‘performers’ walk on. The ground is missing, if one may say so. They have this Big Daddy sitting above who is so obsessed with the pomp and show that he doesn’t even take filmmaking seriously, neither does anything to respect the legacy his late father left him. His shop was running the numbers when a certain superstar was associated with him in and out, the moment the latter was not seen anywhere in the production house’s recent undertakings, there had to be other ‘politics’ to ensure media was always alert about the doings of the Big Daddy. When someone says the rich sell their souls to the Devil, this is exactly what we are referring to. When you forego your actual purpose just to satisfy your ego, you end up digging your own grave, if not today but definitely in the future. No wonder the production house ran into a partnership with another tycoon and the story was run like it were just a business deal that would benefit both the parties? What benefit? There are no ‘actors’ in the films! There is no place for ‘acting’ in the films, at best these movies look like some deodorant advert or some skincare commercial and even a hair spa reel, if one may say so. 

The art bug is not something that can be adopted. You are either an artist, or you are not. An actor might work hard, yes, there is no denying of credit and we have seen it in the case of a certain low-profile actor who gave a smashing performance in a recent spy-film that is supposedly independent, a film that was loved by everyone even if there were factual distortions. In fact, a web series directed by the son of the world’s biggest superstar also had the best casting as far as ‘outsiders’ were concerned. This is what you get when you make a film and not some ‘family picnic’ or ‘family dinner/ lunch/ tea party’, yada yada. The fact that some people are trying to move past the usual politics of film casting is a joke to a few individuals who are tone-deaf and unapologetic megalomaniacs who just can’t bear their fragile egos being busted by the ones who are sincerely trying to be an ‘actor’. What level of degeneracy one is subjected to when it is heard that you sack people because they were in the casting seat and decided that they would prefer the ‘good actors’ over just the ‘good looking ones’? One can be good looking and talented, yes, but just on the premise of looks, how far will the art go?


I was engaging in an Instagram post about how actors in Hollywood no longer look like the ones we grew up watching in the 90s. And then I realised, directors and producers have stopped casting random guys they spot on the street and made an attempt to make their dreams come true. If not the industry politics, there is geo-politics that affect everything else. We now have a dearth of talented musicians, singers, etc. too. Ever wondered why we miss the 90s or the works of art that were produced before that? Because back then we didn’t have goons running the business or the country. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DARK ACADEMIA IS AN AESTHETIC EMOTION ~ Lizaa Khan

Dark Academia has emerged in the twenty-first century as a prominent aesthetic and cultural movement, characterized by its fascination with classical learning, Gothic environments, and intellectual melancholy. While popularized through digital culture, the aesthetic draws deeply from historical academic traditions, European architectural heritage, Romantic literary movements, and twentieth-century campus narratives. This article examines the historical lineage of Dark Academia, explores its thematic continuity across literature and film, and situates its modern resurgence within broader socio-cultural contexts. Dark Academia is not merely an aesthetic; it is a quiet rebellion dressed in wool coats and candlelight. It is a world where the pursuit of knowledge becomes both seduction and salvation, where worn-out books carry the weight of centuries, and where the soul wanders the corridors of thought in search of meaning. To step into Dark Academia is to step into a timeless sanctuary of ...

ROMANTICISING YOUR LIFE THE TRIVIAL WAY~ Lizaa Khan

The only way how someone ever romanticises life according to the books and movies, is going on a date with someone of the opposite gender. The rest of the representation that is out there is mostly YouTubers making a video at the beginning of every new season about "how to do ABC, yada yada..." and mind you, the aesthetics of those videos immediately lift your mood up (humas have been, irrespective of gender ATP, visual creatures when it comes to learning or paying attention to something that may have the key to their 'queries') thereby making you go into a full- blown scrolling ritual and suddenly it is morning to night in the bat of an eyelid. But let's just ground ourselves here for a bit--- not everyone is a content creator, not everyone would want to set up a platform, put on the appropriate amount of makeup and then find a purpose related to the aforementioned. Then what do we do? Here is what we WILL NOT do: a. Rewind to the time when things were 'bette...

THE FORSYTES vs BRIDGERTON

The resurgence of period drama in contemporary television has taken two distinct yet overlapping directions: the preservation of literary realism and the reinvention of history through spectacle and accessibility. The Forsytes (2025), adapted from The Forsyte Saga, and Bridgerton, produced by Netflix, exemplify these divergent approaches. While both series explore aristocratic or upper-middle-class societies structured by marriage, wealth, and social codes, they differ fundamentally in tone, narrative ambition, and ideological framing. A close comparison reveals not only how each interprets the past, but also how they reshape it to resonate with modern audiences.   At the core of their difference lies philosophy of adaptation. The Forsytes attempts, albeit imperfectly, to remain tethered to the moral and psychological concerns of Galsworthy’s original work. It is preoccupied with property, inheritance, and the emotional cost of possession—particularly embodied in the character of...